Showing posts with label POK. Show all posts
Showing posts with label POK. Show all posts

Sunday, October 3, 2010

Banda Singh Bahadur, the valiant Dogra Sikh Minhas Rajput from Rajouri in the Jammu region of Jammu and Kashmir

Banda Singh Bahadur, the valiant Dogra Sikh Minhas Rajput from Rajouri in the Jammu region of Jammu and Kashmir
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

courtesy: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Banda_Bahadur

Banda Singh Bahadur (Punjabi: ਬੰਦਾ ਸਿੰਘ ਬਹਾਦਰ)(1670–1716) was a Sikh warrior and martyr. A Minhas Rajput, he became part of struggle against the Mughal Empire in the early eighteenth century, after meeting Guru Gobind Singh. Guru Gobind Singh gave him the new name of Banda Singh Bahadur. He is best known for the sack of the Mughal provincial capital, Sirhind, and is revered as one of the most hallowed martyrs of the Khalsa.

His brief agrarian uprising against the Mughal administration in the Punjab region of northern India was a critical event in the development of the Dal Khalsa and the Sikh Misls, which eventually led to Ranjit Singh capturing Lahore in 1799 and establishing the Sikh Kingdom of the Punjab.

After establishing his authority in Punjab, Banda Singh Bahadur abolished the zamindari system, and granted property rights to the actual tillers of the land.


Early life

Banda Singh Bahadur was born in a Minhas Rajput family, on October 16, 1670 at Rajouri in the Jammu region of Jammu and Kashmir. He was named Lachman Dev. Wrestling, horseback riding, and hunting were his major hobbies. As a young man, he shot a doe and was shocked to watch the mother and her aborted fawn writhing in pain and dying. After this gloomy scene, he had a change of heart. He left his home and became a disciple of a Bairagi Sadhu, Janaki Das, who gave him the name, Madho Das. In the company of the Sadhu he traveled through Northern India and finally arrived at Nanded (in present-day Maharashtra), situated on the bank of the river Godavari, where he built a hut to meditate upon.

Banda's Mission

Guru Gobind Singh hoped that Emperor Bahadur Shah would fulfill his promise against the Governor of Sirhind, and his accomplices for persecuting the people of Punjab. It was the Governor of Sirhind who had captured and murdered the Guru's mother, Mata Gujri and his two younger children, Sahibzada Zorawar Singh and Sahibzada Fateh Singh, for their continued refusal to convert to Islam. The promise was made by Bahadur Shah to the Guru earlier, when Shah asked the Guru to help him consolidate his rule over India, following the death of his father, Emperor Aurangzeb. Guru Gobind Singh had rendered help to Bahadur Shah in the war of succession after the death of Aurangzeb, in which Bahadur Shah emerged as a victor. Bahadur Shah never carried out his promise. He may have been reluctant to do so or unable to do so during his delicate rule. The Guru was disappointed with duplicity of new Muslim ruler even though he and his Sikhs had been traveling with the Emperor to the Deccan, the Guru decided to part ways with the Muslim ruler for once again betraying Sikhs. Earlier 9th Sikh Guru had been brutally murdered by Bahadur Shah's tyrant and fanatically orthodox Islamist father Aurangzeb.

In a few days, the Guru held a darbar and administered Pahul (ceremonial initiation into Khalsa) to Madho Das and naming him Gurbaksh Singh (beloved by the Guru). He appointed him as his jathedar (military commander) and invested him with full political and military authority as his deputy to lead the campaign in the Punjab against the Muslim and Mughal administration, to avenge the murders of Sikh gurus and their families and innocent civilian followers by Muslims, and to punish Nawab Wazir Khan and his supporters for these inhumane crimes.

The Guru gave Banda five arrows from his quiver by as a symbol of temporal authority. He was given an advisory council of the following five devoted Sikhs (Hazuri Singhs), who on their arrival in the Punjab were to assure the Sikhs that Banda was the Guru's nominee and deputy and to organize them in order to lead an expedition against Muslims and Sirhind to avenge the atrocities against Sikhs:

Bhagwant Singh Bangeshri, a cousin of Bhai Mani Singh
Baj Singh, brother of Bhagwant Singh Singh
Kuir Singh singh, brother of Bhagwant Singh Singh
Dharam Singh
Fateh Singh

(These names appear in 'Guru Kian Sakhin' written in 1790 by Swarup Singh kaushish).

Twenty five soldiers were to accompany Banda from Nanded to Punjab. A Hukumnamah (edict) by the Guru, instructing Sikhs to join Banda Bahadur in his struggle against Muslim tyrant Wazir Khan (Mughal Goverener of Punjab) was provided. As an insignia of the temporal authority vested in him, the Guru also gave Banda Bahadur his own sword, green bow, nagara (War drum) and a Nishan Sahib (religious sign as sign of divine approval for churshing Muslims for preservation of the local native Indian dharma). Three hundred Sikh Risaldari ( cavaliers) in battle array accompanied Banda up to a distance of eight kilometres to give him a final send off.


Banda's strategy and tactics

4. Strategy in simple language is the high level planning prior to a campaign and tactics in its implementation. Banda’s strategy was to reach Punjab after avoiding the dangers enroute and mobilizing an army of volunteers arming and training them in an impossibly short period, and then by the tactics of, what I term as the "Crumbling Process", bite into the mighty Mughal administrative centers one by one. This process was the only way to achieve the Guru’s mission of punishing a powerful enemy who was committing crime after crime against his people. Banda must have mentally and theoretically made grandiose plans during his long journey of nearly one year from Nander to Punjab. Whatever these dreams, this born leader of men executed them to perfection with a masterly application of the crumbling process. One by one the Mughal bastions, SAMANA, GHURAM, THASKA, MUSTAFBAD and SADHAURA were captured, until he reached the outskirts of SIRHIND. His main target was to revenge the ruthless torture and killing of the brave and innocent SAHIBZADAS.

5. Instinctively, Banda Bahadur adopted the vital principles of war - Surprise Flexibility, Offensive action and Concentration of Force at a point to gain local superiority. He overcame garrison after garrison by brilliantly applying these to perfection. Even Muslim authors of the time such as Qazi Noor Mohammad, Ghulam Hussain Mohammad, Qasim Kamwar Khan and Khafi Khan grudgingly praised the Tiger-like fighting quality of the Sikh Soldier. In an article of a magazine it is not possible to trace Banda Bahadur's entire campaign, so as to highlight his brilliant strategy and tactics. Yet it would be worthwhile amplifying this by select examples.


Banda in present-day Haryana

Narnaul

Here, Banda Singh Bahadur witnesses first-hand, the complete destruction of the Satnami sect which had risen in revolt against the Mughals. Men, women and children, one and all had been wiped out of existence. It was here that Banda Singh Bahadur suppressed some dacoits and robbers.

Hissar

He was well received by local Hindus and Sikhs as a leader and a deputy of Guru Gobind Singh. Liberal offerings were made to him, which he distributed among the poor and the needy.

Tohana

Here, Banda Singh Bahadur issued letters to the Sikhs of Malwa, to join him in his crusade against Wazir Khan of Sirhind.

Banda Singh Bahadur made proper arrangements to escort Mata Sahib Kaur to Delhi. From Kharkhauda about fifty kilometres north-west of Delhi, Mata Sahib Kaur was sent to Delhi under armed escort, to join Mata Sundari, who was acting as the head of the Khalsa after the death of her husband, Guru Gobind Singh.

Sonepat

At Sonepat, fifty kilometres north of Delhi, early in November 1709 Banda Singh Bahadur commanded about five hundred followers. He attacked the government treasury, plundered it and distributed it among his retinue. This was his second success against the government and it considerably raised his prestige. Marching slowly, he advanced towards Sirhind.

Kaithal

Near Kaithal, about a hundred kilometres further north, Banda Singh Bahadur seized a government treasury, which was being sent from the northern districts to Delhi. He kept nothing out of it for himself and gave it away to his rank and file.

Samana: Mobility, surprise and economy of Banda's force

SAMANA was strongly fortified. It had a wall all around, every Haveli was a fortress and the Mughal force was well armed and had deployed guns for the towns defence. Banda Bahadur's plan on 26 Nov 1709 was to lie up at a distance the previous day thus lulling the defenders into a feigned lack of will and intent to attack. That night the Sikh force did a brilliant rapid approach from some miles, entered the town from all directions before the gates could be closed and after negligible opposition totally captured and sacked SAMANA by the next day’s nightfall. Thus the three main principles of war of Surprise, Mobility and Economy of Force (he took least casualties) were applied with brilliance.

Samana is fifty kilometres farther north, was the native place of Jalal-ud-din Jallad - the professional executioner who had beheaded Guru Teg Bahadur. While Jalal-ud-din Jallad son had beheaded the two younger sons of Guru Gobind Singh. Ali Hussain, who betrayed Guru Gobind Singh by making false promises to lured Guru Gobind Singh to evacuate the fort of Anandpur also belonged to Samana. Samana was an accursed place of betraying Muslims in the eyes of the accepting and trusting Sikhs.

The entire Sikh peasantry of the neighbourhood was now up in arms and sided with Banda Singh, such was the centuries old accumulated anger of native Sikhs against Muslims that peasant army following Banda Singh had risen to several thousands. Banda Singh Bahadur fell upon the Samana town (present day Jind District in Haryana state of India) on November 26, 1709. The Muslim inhabitants were massacred in the same cold blood as Muslims earlier did to Sikhs. Samana town was razed to the ground to avenge the past atrocities of Muslims.

At that time, Samana was the district town and had nine Parganas attached to it. It was placed under the charge of brave Sikh warrior Fateh Singh. Samana was the first territorial conquest and was established as the first administrative unit of Banda Singh Bahadur.

Treacherous Ranghar Muslims of Samana, Ghuram and Thaksa Destroyed

Then, Kunjpura (Karnal district of Haryana, India), Ghuram, and Thaska inhabited by Muslim Ranghars were destroyed. Ranghars are current age Muslims who were once original honorable Rajputs but forced to convert by Muslims, often by humiliatingly marrying/giving their rajput daughters to non-rajput Muslims invaders. Currently, there is an undercurrent movement among educated Ranghars to purify to reconnect to roots by reconverting to Hindu dharma and Sikh panth by shunning the shameful past of humiliating conversion by cold-blooded foreign Muslim invader.

Damla: Muslim Killer of Sikh Gurus and their familes destroyed

Damla was the village of the treacherous pathan Muslim contingents who had taken employment with Guru Gobind Singh after being dismissed from the Mughal forces, who had deserted Guru Gobind Singh at the start of the Battle of Bhangani with Muslims. Banda Bahadur taught them a lessons by ravaging Muslim pathan village of Damla. Shahabad Markanda's Muslims also fell to the brave Sikh forces of Banda Singh Bahadur.

Sadhaura

Usman Khan, the Muslim chief of Sadhaura, about twenty-five kilometres away, had persecuted Sayyid Budhu Shah for helping Guru Gobind Singh in the Battle of Bhangani. On the approach of Banda Singh Bahadur's army, the leading Muslims of the town gathered in a big and strongly built mansion. They were all quickly put to death by brave forces of Sikhs peasant followers of bada Bahadur to establish native rule of kings with native religion with tolerant views. This building where Sikhs avenged by killing all occupants has come to be known as Qatal Garhi (the Fort of Murder). Banda Singh Bahadur destroyed the Muslim dominated quarters of the town.

A contemporary Muslim historian, Khafi Khan, wrote: "In two or three months time, four to five thousands horse-riders, and seven to eight thousand warlike footmen joined him. Day by day their number increased, and abundant money and material by pillage of muslims fell into the hands hands of Hindu and Sikh warriors. Numerous muslim villages were laid waste and Banda Singh bahadur appointed his own Sikh native police officers (thanedars) and established his sovereignty by setting up of the collectors of revenue (Tahsil-dar-e-mal)".

Mukhlisgarh becomes Lohgarh

The ultimate aim of Banda was to punish Wazir Khan and conquer Sirhind. It required time to consolidate his material and territorial gains. He also wanted to study the military resources of Sirhind. He was anxious to see what steps the government would take against him. He therefore established his headquarters, in the beginning of February 1710, at Mukhlisgarh situated in the lower Siwalik Hills south of Nahan, about twenty kilometres from Sadhaura. His fort stood atop a hill top. Two kuhls or water channels flowed at its base and supplied water to it. This fort was repaired and put in a state of defence. All the money, gold and costly material acquired in the expeditions were deposited here. He minted coins and issued orders under his seal. The name of Mukhlisgarh was changed to Lohgarh (Fort of Steel), and it became the capital of the first Sikh state.

Sirhind, the Principal Town of SE Punjab was Banda Bahadur's goal. To all Sikhs it represented the cruelty of its Governor, Wazir Khan had to render an account for this bestial act. James Brown, the British Historian described it as most barbarous and outrageous. No wonder then that the Sikhs were thirsting for his blood. Wazir Khan sent a strong force under Sher Mohammed Khan of Malerkotla towards ROPAR to prevent a large force of Sikhs from Doaba and Majha joining Banda’s main force moving from BANUR. After a very fierce battle the valiant Sikhs prevailed. It was the bloody hand to hand battle on the battlefield, in which Sikhs dominated, which won the day. Thus Banda succeeded in concentrating his force for the final battle.

Banda's kingdom

Banda ruled over the region bounded on the north by the Shiwalik hills, on the west by the river Tangri, on the east by the river Jamuna, and in the south by a line passing through Samana, Thanesar, Kaithal and Karnal. He abolished the Zamindari System of land prevailing under the Mughals and declared the actual cultivators as the owners of land. Thus he established peasant proprietorship, and won the approbation and support of the overwhelming majority of the population. Khafi Khan says that Banda "issued orders to imperial officers and agents and big jagirdars to submit and give up their business."

The battle of Sirhind

Banda's Troops

Banda Singh Bahadur devoted three months in organizing his civil and military administration. Bahadur Shah was still away only less than 100 km from Delhi, yet the weak and nominal Muslim rulers of Delhi of Mohgul origin had no strength to confront Banda Singh Bahadur.

Wazir Khan of Sirhind was making his own preparations independently to meet the danger from Banda Singh Bahadur.

Banda's troops were mostly untrained Sikh peasants, raw levies and not fully armed. Banda possessed no elephants, no good horses and few guns. His followers had immense Sikh pride coupled with burning desire to avenge against Muslims, armed only with matchlocks, agricultural spears, swords, bows and arrows. According to Khafi Khan, the number of Banda's troops rose from thirty to forty thousand. Muslims mohgul completely lost the control of areas in current day Harayana and Panjab. Assisted by his Sikh peasant army, Banda Singh Bahadur established complete and popular sovereignty, implementing agricultural land ownership reforms and accumulating volunteer Sarv-khap based Sikh forces to fight to over throw Muslims controls. Jats and Rajputs supported by all other castes belonging to Hindu and Sikh played a vital part, even to the extent of eliminating converted Ranghars who mainly cow-towed and submitted to their conquering Muslim rulers.

Wazir Khan's preparations

Wazir Khan had proclaimed a jihad or a holy war against Banda. He was joined by the Nawab of Malerkotla, other Muslim chiefs and jagirdars as well as Ranghars in large numbers. The majority of his soldiers were trained men. Wazir Khan's own forces were six thousand horsemen, eight to nine thousand musketeers (burqandaz) and archers, and with these about ten guns of artillery and many elephants. In addition, there were about ten thousand Ghazis. The total number of Wazir Khan's troops was about thirty thousand.

Banda advanced from Lohgarh and halted at Banur, near Ambala, fourteen kilometres from Rajpura. Banda sacked the town, and then went towards Sirhind.

The Battle of Chhappar Chiri

It is said that like Napolean, Banda Bahadur observed the battlefield from a high and prominent area. He kept in hand an elite reserve ready to be committed in a lightning strike in the most vulnerable area in order to achieve a breakthrough. At Chappar Chiri the Mughals were far superior in numbers, Weapons and Guns. Banda’s soldiers had long spears, arrows, swords and of course indomitable courage. He lost men in the early phase of the battle but broke through by launching himself and his lion like reserves at a vital moment in a weakened salient on the plains of Chappar Chiri's wide open battlefield. So fierce was this, that as described by Khafi Khan, horses, elephants fell in the hands of the infidels horsemen and footmen in large numbers fell under the swords of the infidels, who pursued them as far as SIRHIND. Wazir Khan fell from his horse and was captured alive. The Mughal army was completely routed but Banda Bahadur lost nearly 5000 soldiers killed and his men carried out the last rites of the fallen Sikhs at the battle site before entering SIRHIND. Wazir khan was killed and his body hung from a prominent tree upside down. This tree still stands as a symbol of the fate that is reserved for tyrants.

The battle was fought on May 12, 1710 at Chhappar Chiri, twenty kilometres from Sirhind. On the Mughal side, Sher Muhammad Khan, the Nawab of Malerkotla was the leader of the right flank. Wazir Khan was in command of the centre. Suchanand, Diwan of the Nawab was put on the left. Suchanand instigated the death of Guru Gobind Singh's youngest two children. On the Sikhs' side, Baj Singh and Binod Singh (two of the five Sikhs sent by Guru Gobind along with Banda to the Punjab) headed the right and left flanks respectively while Banda commanded the centre facing Wazir Khan's army.

Suchanand could not withstand Baj Singh's attack and fled. Sher Mohammed Khan was about to overpower Binod Singh's wing when he was suddenly struck by a bullet and was instantly killed. His men immediately dispersed. Wazir Khan was rushing upon Banda who stuck fast to his ground and discharged arrows relentlessly. Baj Singh and Binod Singh now joined Banda. During their combined assault, Wazir Khan was killed.

Wazir Khan's death is variously described. According to the most accepted view Baj Singh rushed upon Wazir Khan, who threw a spear at the Sikh. Baj Singh caught hold of it and flung the same spear upon Wazir Khan. It struck the forehead of his horse. Wazir Khan discharged an arrow which hit Baj Singh's arm, before rushing upon him with his sword. At this juncture, Fateh Singh came to Baj Singh's rescue. It is related that he swung his sword with such force that Wazir Khan was sliced from shoulder to waist.

Lessons learned

Concentration of Force

Banda Bahadur did not attack Wazir Khan's Army until he was able to join up with the Khalsa re-inforcements from Majha and Doaba. This he did, inspite of knowing that the enemy was digging in and preparing formidable defences at Chapper Chiri. He hid his forces from effective artillery fire in the thick grove of trees behind small hillocks.

Flexibility

This time Banda knew that surprise had been lost and, this was now a battle between a large well equipped Mughal Army with Guns, which would decimate his force in a frontal attack. He now changed his tactics and ordered commando raids at night to first silence the Artillery which were causing heavy casualties even under cover. Once this was done, his archers and musketeers, who were under cover, caused heavy casualties to the Enemy Cavalry and the elephants ran riot. In this confusion his own cavalry must have attacked the flanks and rear, while his valiant marching troops launched early morning frontal attacks. They still took casualties as the Mughal fire power was still effective until hand to hand fighting was joined. Here Banda timed his master stroke to perfection. Observing the whole scene from a high Tibba, he launched himself and his reserves - a brilliant strike into the Mughal vitals. Sikhs were masters of hand to hand fighting. Once the Mughal lines broke, there was no stopping the offensive force. It was indeed brilliant victory for a brilliant Commander. He had not violated a single principal of war.

Pursuit of fugitives

Wazir Khan's head was stuck up on a spear and lifted high up by a Sikh who took his seat in the deceased's howdah. Sirhind's troops on beholding the Nawab's head took alarm, and fled in dismay and despair. The Sikhs fell upon them and there was a terrible carnage. The Sikhs reached Sirhind by nightfall. The gates of the city were closed. The guns mounted on the walls of the fort commenced bombardment. The Sikhs laid siege to the place. They took rest at night. Wazir Khan's family and many Muslim nobles fled to Delhi at night.

By the next afternoon, the Sikhs forced open the gates and fell upon the city. The Government treasury and moveable property worth two crores fell into Banda's hand which was removed to Lohgarh. Banda Singh Bahadur purified several Muslims (who were earlier forcefully converted to Islam from Hinduism) by letting them to embraced Sikhism by their free will. For example, Dindar Khan son of Jalal Khan Rohilla purified himself by purging himself of Islam by embracing Sikhism by changing his name as Dindar Singh. Same way Mir Nasir-ud-din the official newswriter of Sirhind, purified himself by shunning Islam and reconverting with new name as Mir Nasir Singh.

The province of Sirhind occupied

Sirhind was the economic and provincial capital of Mughals.The entire province of Sirhind consisting of twenty-eight paraganas and extending from the Satluj to the Jamuna and from the Shiwalik hills to Kunjpura, Karnal and Kaithal, yielding Rs. fifty-two lakhs (one lakh = one hundred thousand) annually came into Banda's possession. Baj Singh was appointed the governor of Sirhind. Ali Singh was made his deputy. Their chief responsibility was to be on guard against the Mughal troops from Lahore and Jammu. Fateh Singh retained charge of Samana. Ram Singh, brother of Baj singh became the Chief of Thanesar. Binod singh in addition to his post of the revenue minister, was entrusted with the administration of Karnal and Panipat. His main duty was to guard the road from Delhi. Banda retired to his capital at Lohgarh. His era began from May 12, 1710, the date of his victory in the battle of Sirhind. The Zamindari system was abolished in the whole province in one stroke.

Banda advances towards Lahore

Having set up an administrative machinery, Banda advanced from Sirhind to Malerkotla in June, 1710. The town was saved for a ransom of two lakhs on the recommendation of Kishan Das Banya, an old acquaintance of Banda. From there, he marched to Morinda whose faujdar had handed over Guru Gobind Singh's Mother and His two younger Sons to Wazir Khan. Then he visited Kiratpur and Anandpur to pay homage to shrines. He took Hoshiarpur and Jalandhar. Banda crossed the Beas into Majha, and fell upon Batala. After this, he went on a pilgrimage to Dera Baba Nanak. At Amritsar, Banda made large offerings. He invited young men to embrace Sikhism. Many from Majha joined the Khalsa. Banda marched towards Lahore. Sayyid Islam Khan, the Governor, mounted guns on the walls of the city. Banda laid a siege, but was unable to scale the walls of the fort. Lahore could have fallen, but Banda was in a hurry to look after his new government.

Only the Lahore Fort, owing to its fortifications, and housing the Moghul elite, could escape Banda Bahadur. The rest of the city and suburbs were destroyed by the army of Banda Bahadur.

Banda versus muslims

Banda's rule, that drained the Mohgul empire, had a far-reaching impact on the history of the Punjab. With it began the decay of Muslim and Mughal authority (eventually relegated to within the walls of their Delhi force and bulk of their territory taken over by Ranjit Singh & Marathas, and later by British) and the demolition of the feudal system of society it had created.

Muslims Mohgul King Bahadur Shah Issues Farman to Kill all Sikhs

Weakened and nominal Mughal emperor Bahadur Shah tried to counter Banda's increasing influence. Bahadur Shah journeyed northwards from the Deccan to punish the Sikhs. Instructions were issued to the governors of Delhi and Oudh and other Mughal officers to march towards the Punjab. Prohibitory laws against Sikhs were passed. On December 10, 1710, Emperor Bahadur Shah I issued a general warrant for the faujdars to "kill the worshippers of Nanak (the Sikhs), wherever they were to be found." (Nanak Prastan ra Har ja kih bayaband baqatl rasanand)

Retreat and Regains by Banda

A massive Mughal force drove the Sikhs from Sirhind and other places to take shelter in the fort of Lohgarh in the hilly region. Banda married the daughter of one of the hill chiefs. Further reinforcements arrived and sixty thousand horse and foot soon surrounded Banda's hill retreat. For want of provisions, the Sikhs were reduced to rigorous straits. When they could stand up to the numerically superior enemy no longer, they made strategic nightly sallies to escape into the hills of Nahan, only to regroup later.

He again started his campaigns against the Mughals, coming down from the hills to the plains, but was overwhelmed by the superior numbers of Mughal forces. Sikhs came out of their mountain haunts to recover their lost territories and once again occupied Sadhaura and Lohgarh. Farrukhsiyar, who came to the throne of Delhi in 1713, ordered against them the sternest campaign yet launched.

They were hounded out of the plains and their main column of about 4,000 men under Banda were subjected to a terrible siege at the village of Gurdas-Nangal, about six kilometers from Gurdaspur. For eight months the garrison resisted the siege of 100,000 Mughal troops under gruesome conditions (1 Sikh against 25 Muslims). Towards the end, an unfortunate dispute arose between Banda and one of his most trusted advisers, Binod Singh. This man along with Baj Singh and three others made up the war council that Banda was supposed to consult in any difficult situation. Binod Singh advised the evacuation of the fortress, but vailant Banda wished to fight Muslims out there. Binod Singh was senior in age, and when this difference of views flared up into an open quarrel, Banda agreed to let Binod Singh take his men out of the Fortress. Binod Singh and his supporters then charged out of the fortress and escaped.

Towards the end of November 1715, the remaining defenders were running out of ammunition and food. They were trying to exist on boiled leaves and the bark of trees, and were gradually reduced to mere skeletons. Then on December 17, 1715, Abdus Samad Khan, one of the Mughal commanders, shouted across the separating moat, that he would not allow any killing by his men, if Banda opened the gate to the fortress. When Banda ordered the gate be opened, the Mughals rushed in to spear or stab as many as three hundred of the half-dead and helpless defenders. About seven hundred were captured alive and handcuffed in twos. Banda had chains round his ankles and his wrists, and was then locked in an iron cage. The Mughals were still afraid that he might escape and so they placed a guard on each side of the cage with swords drawn and the cage was placed aloft an elephant, which led the procession, which paraded through Lahore, before proceeding towards Delhi. Zakarya Khan, the son of the Lahore Governor, then ordered his men to lop off more Sikh heads on the way. The prisoners were first taken to Lahore, and thence to Delhi. Thus Muslims made a spectacle of killing sikhs and displaying their heads in most humiliating manner.

Torture and execution

The cavalcade to the imperial capital was a grisly sight. Besides 740 prisoners in heavy chains, it comprised seven hundred cartloads of Sikh heads with another 200 stuck upon pikes. On February 26, 1716, the procession neared Delhi, and Farukh Siyar ordered his Minister, Mohammed Amin Khan, to go out to receive them and to prepare them for a suitable display in the city. On February 29, the citizens of Delhi lined the streets, to get a good sight of the procession..

First came two-thousand soldiers, each holding a Sikh head impaled on his upright spear. Next followed the elephant carrying Banda in his iron cage, still with two Muslim guards guarding him, with their swords unsheathed. A gold-laced red turban was placed on his head, and to add further mockery to his plight, a brightly printed scarlet robe was slipped on his body. Then came 740 prisoners (500 had been collected on the way). These men were chained in pairs and thrown across the backs of camels. Their faces were blackened, and pointed sheepskin or paper caps were clapped on their heads. Behind this line came the Mughal Commanders, Abdus Samad Khan, his son Qamar-ud-Din Khan, and his son-in-law Zakaria Khan. Their men lined both sides of the streets.

For seven days, executions were carried out, until all the ordinary captives had been disposed off. Their bodies were loaded on wagons and taken out of town to be thrown to the vultures. The heads were hung up on trees or on poles near the market-place to be a lesson to all rebels. The jailors next turned their attention to the 20 major leaders, including Baj Singh, Fateh Singh, Ali Singh and Gulab Singh. These men were tortured to the extreme and were asked to divulge the place where they had buried all the treasures that had been looted from Sirhind, Batala and other towns during their better days.

Failing to get any clues after three months, they prepared to put an end to their lives on Sunday, June 9, 1716. Banda's cage was again hoisted on top of an elephant, and he was dressed in the mock attire of an emperor, with a colourful red pointed turban on his head. His four-year old son, Ajai Singh was placed in his lap. The twenty chiefs marched behind the elephant and this procession then passed through the streets of Delhi, and headed for the mausoleum of Bahadur Shah, near the Qutub Minar. On reaching the graveyard, the captives were again offered a choice of two alternatives: conversion to Islam or death. All chose death. They were tortured again before being executed. Their heads were then impaled on spears and arranged in a circle around Banda who was now squatting on the ground. There were hundreds of spectators standing around watching this scene.

Banda Singh Bahadur was then given a short sword and ordered to kill his own son Ajai Singh. As Banda Bahadur sat unperturbed, the barbaric Muslim executioner moved forward and plunged his sword into the little sikh child cutting the body into two. Then pieces of flesh for the body of a four year old innocent child were cut and thrown in Banda's face. His liver was removed and with force thrust into Banda Singh's mouth. The father sat through all this without any signs of emotion. His powers of endurance were to be tested still further. But before that, Mohammed Amin Khan, who was standing near, spoke as follows: "From your manner so far you appear to be a man of virtue, who believes in God, and in doing good deeds. You are also very intelligent. Can you tell me why you are having to suffer all this here?"

Banda's reply to his premitive Muslim sadistic tyrants was, "When the tyrants oppress their subjects to the limit, then God sends men like me on this earth to mete out punishment to them. But being human, we sometimes overstep the laws of justice, and for that we are made to pay whilst we are still here. God is not being unjust to me in any way."

The executioner then stepped forward and thrust the point of his dagger into Banda's right eye, pulling out the eyeball. He then pulled out the other eyeball. Banda sat through all this as still as a rock. His face gave no twitch of pain.

Then the executioner took his sword and slashed off Banda's left foot, then both his arms. But Banda's features were still calm as if he was at peace with his Creator. Finally they tore off his flesh with red-hot pincers, and there being nothing else left in the tyrannical Muslim's book of tortures, those murderous Muslim beasts cut Banda bahadur's body up into a hundred pieces, and were satisfied in their saddist way. (These details of the torture are given in full, by the following writers: Mohammed Harisi, Khafi Khan, Thornton, Elphinstone, Daneshwar and others).


Legacy

With Banda's death, Khalsa leadership was taken up by new warriors like Baba Deep Singh, Nawab Kapur Singh, Chhajja Singh, Bhuma Singh, Hari Singh Dhillon, Jassa Singh Ramgarhia, Jassa Singh Ahluwalia, Budh Singh, Naudh Singh and Charhat Singh Sukerchakia and others. The Age of the Dal Khalsa and the Sikh Misls (principalities) had dawned. Within ninety years, Ranjit Singh Sukerchakia united the Misls, captured Lahore and established the Sikh Kingdom of the Punjab.


Tuesday, July 20, 2010

आखिर कश्मीर समस्या क्या है?

[आर. विक्रम सिंह: लेखक पूर्व सैन्य अधिकारी हैं]


धर्म साम्राज्य भौगोलिक बाध्यताओं केसम्मुख असहाय हो जाते हैं। भूगोल ही संस्कृतियों का मुख्य कर्ता होता है। कश्मीर के रास्ते में हिंदूकुश पड़ता है। खैबर और बोलन दर्र्रो से आ रहे धर्म साम्राज्य निर्माताओं ने कोशिशें तो कीं, लेकिन वे इलाके का भाग्य नहीं बदल सके। चूंकि अब कश्मीर बड़ी समस्या मान ली गई है तो समाधान आसान कैसे हो सकता है? किसी जमाने में स्कर्वी नाम की भयानक बीमारी से बड़ी संख्या में समुद्री यात्री मरा करते थे। एक मामूली डाक्टर ने बताया कि यह बीमारी नींबू का रस पीने से ठीक हो जाती है। ठीक होने भी लगी, लेकिन इतनी भयंकर बीमारी के इतने आसान इलाज की बात स्वीकार करने में ही सौ साल लगे। आज इस बीमारी के बारे में सुना भी नहीं जाता। 


एक सवाल की रोशनी में कश्मीर की समस्या देखी जाए। अगर कश्मीर मतांतरित न हुआ होता, हिंदू या बौद्ध ही बना रहता तो क्या आज कश्मीर समस्या होती? हां, कश्मीर में समस्याएं तो होतीं, रोजगार और गरीबी की, अशिक्षा की और विकास की, जैसे कि बाकी भारत में है, लेकिन कोई कश्मीर-समस्या न होती।


राजनीति जब ईश्वर-अल्लाह के नाम पर चलने लगती है तो जाहिर है वह हमें आज की समस्याओं का समाधान नहीं देती। क्या धर्म ने पाकिस्तान की समस्याओं का समाधान कर दिया है? नहीं, क्योंकि धर्म तो जिंदगी के बाद का रास्ता बनाता है। हमने शोपियां में दो महिलाओं की हत्याओं की प्रतिक्रिया देखी है, जैसे संपूर्ण घाटी में उबाल आ गया हो। वहीं जब दहशतगर्र्दो द्वारा शीराजा की हत्या की गई तो सन्नाटा छा जाता है। अमरनाथ यात्रा की भूमि पर घाटी में हुए आदोलन को भी देखा है। अगर धर्म का फर्क न होता तो क्या ये प्रतिक्रियाएं होतीं?


हमें मालूम है कि कश्मीर के अलगाववादी आदोलन की असलियत क्या है। अगर कश्मीर पाकिस्तान के कब्जे में चला जाता तो वही सब कुछ पाकिस्तानी भू-स्वामीवर्ग और पाकिस्तानी सेना द्वारा वहां किया जाता, जो कबाइलियों ने 1947 में प्रारंभ किया था। हुर्रियत के बिलाल गनी लोन ने स्वीकार किया है कि ये पैसों पर बिकी कायरों की जमातें हैं। पाकिस्तान का समापन किस रूप में होगा, इसका परिदृश्य सामने आने लगा है। कश्मीर को अपनी आखिरी उम्मीद मानकर वह किसी भी तरह वार्ताओं का दौर प्रारंभ करना चाहता है।


पाकिस्तान से वार्ता करना तो उसके आतंकी और साजिशी स्वरूप को मान्यता देना है। आजादी के आदोलन के अंतिम दौर में कश्मीर को लेकर ब्रिटिश सोच बदल चुकी थी। यही सोच समस्या का कारण बनी। 


माउंटबेटन उत्तरी कश्मीर के स्ट्रेटेजिक महत्व से वाकिफ थे। उन्होंने सेनाओं को जानबूझकर उड़ी से डोमेल, मुजफ्फराबाद की ओर नहीं बढ़ने दिया। वह चाहते थे कि गिलगिट बालतिस्तान का क्षेत्र पाकिस्तान के कब्जे में रहे, जिससे आगे चलकर सीटो, सेंटो संगठन द्वारा उसका उपयोग सैन्य अड्डों के लिए किया जा सके।


कश्मीर मामला संयुक्त राष्ट्र में ले जाने के प्रस्ताव में उनकी मुख्य भूमिका थी।


शेख अब्दुल्ला जनमत संग्रह के पक्ष में नहीं थे, लेकिन जनमत संग्रह के प्रस्ताव ने कश्मीर को एक ऐसी ओपेन एंडेड स्कीम का रूप दे दिया जिसमें कभी भी कोई भी निवेश कर सकता है। 


शेख अब्दुल्ला ने कश्मीर में चुनावों के बाद पहली विधानसभा में ही भारत में विलय का प्रस्ताव स्वीकृत कराया जिससे जनमत संग्रह का झगड़ा ही खत्म हो जाए।


हिंदू मुसलमान का विवाद खत्म करने के लिए उन्होंने कश्मीरियत की बात की। 


इसलिए कश्मीर समस्या के लिए शेख अब्दुल्ला को दोष देना गलत है। भारत के राजनीतिक दलों ने शेख के सामने जो धर्मसंकट था उसे समझने की कोई कोशिश नहीं की।


कश्मीर की इन नकली समस्याओं के कारण जो असल समस्याएं शिक्षा, रोजगार और विकास की हैं, पीछे रह गई हैं। इस जाहिलियत के माहौल ने उन्हें राष्ट्रीय नागरिक नहीं बनने दिया। हम सशक्त देश हैं, पर कमजोरों की तरह व्यवहार करते हैं। गठबंधनों से आ रही सत्ताएं हमारी कमजोरी का मूल स्त्रोत बन गई हैं। घटक दलों के सामने दुम हिलाना और फिर उसी सास में चीन को चेतावनी देना कहां संभव है?


आखिर कश्मीर समस्या क्या है? 


क्या जो समस्या कश्मीर की है वही जम्मू की भी है?


क्या लद्दाख भी वही सोचता है जो घाटी के हुर्रियत नेता चाहते हैं?


जो बात जम्मू के लिए कोई समस्या नहीं वह कश्मीर घाटी के चालीस लाख लोगों के लिए समस्या क्यों है? 


यह मूलत: एक मनोवैज्ञानिक समस्या है 'हिंदू भारत' के साथ रहने की। वे हमारे 15 करोड़ मुसलमानों से अपने को अलग समझते हैं। कश्मीर घाटी के लोगों को अलगाववादी मानसिकता के हवाले कर दिया गया है। यह मनोविज्ञान जनमत संग्रह के अनायास स्वीकार से पैदा हुआ है। इतिहास में कहीं भी और कभी भी वोट देकर राष्ट्रीयताओं पर निर्णय नहीं हुआ।









यह नेहरू युग का ऐसा फैसला था जो वास्तव में हमारी इस मनोवैज्ञानिक समस्या की जड़ में है। जनमत संग्रह के तर्क की मजबूरी के कारण आज के कश्मीरी नेताओं की भाषा आजादी, स्वशासन, खुदमुख्तारी, संयुक्त शासन आदि शब्दजालों की बन गई है।


पाकिस्तान के रहते उनका धर्मसंकट बरकरार है। जब से पाकिस्तान परमाणु हथियारों से संपन्न हुआ है, हम उसी स्तर के देश रह गए हैं। चीन और भारत यदि बराबर के शक्तिशाली देश होते तो निश्चित ही तिब्बत आज चीन की एक बड़ी समस्या के रूप में होता। हमारी समस्या कश्मीर नहीं, बल्कि पाकिस्तान है। 


मनोवैज्ञानिक समस्याओं का इलाज आपरेशन नहीं होता। सशक्त राष्ट्र की तरह व्यवहार करना हमें अपने से बहुत छोटे देशों वियतनाम, इजरायल, ईरान यहां तक कि पाकिस्तान से भी सीखना है। युद्ध अवश्यंभावी है तो युद्ध होगा, लेकिन उसकी आशकाओं से कमजोरों की तरह व्यवहार करना हमें समाधान की ओर नहीं ले जाता।





[आर. विक्रम सिंह: लेखक पूर्व सैन्य अधिकारी हैं]

Wednesday, July 14, 2010

Accession of Jammu and Kashmir to India-- The Story Behind -- I



Accession of Jammu and Kashmir to India-- The Story Behind -- I



Pakistan, though entered into Standstill Agreement, had an eye on Jammu and Kashmir. Even before the lapse of the British paramountcy on J&K, Mr.Mohammed Ali Jinnah, author of two-nation theory, had plans to grab the Paradise on Earth. 

He had once boastfully declared that "Kashmir is blank cheque in my pocket." The Pakistan’s designs on Kashmir could be well judged from the comments appearing on August 24, 1947 issue of its semi-official daily Dawn, "… the time has come to tell the Maharaja of Kashmir that he must make his choice and choose Pakistan…. Should Kashmir fail to join Pakistan the gravest possible trouble will inevitably ensue." 

In his bid to woo Sher-I-Kashmir Sheikh Mohammed Abdullah, the undisputed leader of Kashmir, Mr.Jinnah visited Srinagar a couple of times, but failed to achieve his objective. Even his arrogance and browbeating tactic did not pay him.

The Maharaja was already facing a formidable challenge from the people who had launched the Quit Kashmir movement under the leadership of Sher-I-Kashmir Sheikh Mohammad Abdullah against the autocratic rule. Quit Kashmir movement ran parallel to the national movement with Sheikh Mohammad Abdullah having close association with the leaders of the national movement against British rule. 

The national leaders like Mahatma Gandhi and Pandit Nehru too espoused the cause of the people of Kashmir seeking political freedom from autocratic rule. To deal with the people’s upsurge, Maharaja had even detained Sheikh Abdullah on May 20, 1946 for spearheading ‘Quit-Kashmir’ movement. Faced with new alarming situation arising out of repeated violations of the Standstill Agreement by Pakistan and blocking of Pindi-Srinagar road, the Maharaja set him free on September 29, 1947. 

Sher-I-Kashmir, as he was fondly called by the people for his unmatched courage, deputed his close aide Kh.G.M.Sadiq to Pakistan to tell Pak leaders about the sentiments of the people who can not be taken for granted and coerced to join them. This plain speaking did not desist Pak for her designs.

While addressing a mammoth public meeting at Hazuri Bagh, Srinagar on October 1, 1947, Sher-I-Kashmir had made things about the future of the state obvious when he said, "Till the last drop of my blood, I will not believe in two-nation theory." It was yet another rebuff to Mr.Jinnah.

Finding their designs on Kashmir not fructifying, Pakistan rulers launched an armed attack on Jammu and Kashmir to annex it. Tribals in thousands alongwith Pak regular troops entered the State on October 22, 1947 from several points and indulged in bloodshed and mayhem. The bewildered people of the estate were not expecting an attack from Pakistan especially in view of the Standstill Agreement.

Bowing before the wishes of the people as reflected by Muslim dominated National Conference and to push back the invaders, the Maharaja signed the Instrument of Accession in favour of India on October 26, 1947 on the prescribed terms and conditions. This was accepted by the Governor General of India, Lord Mountbattan next day. 

The Instrument of Accession executed by Maharaja Hari Singh was the same which was signed by other rulers of the princely States. Similarly, the acceptance of the Instrument of Accession by the Governor General was also identical in respect of all such instruments. He was to write, "I do hereby accept the Instrument of Accession." It could not be conditional as mere acceptance by the Governor General was complete and final.

With J&K becoming legal and constitutional part of Union of India, the troops were rushed to the state to push back the invaders and vacate aggression from the territory of the state. The first batch of Indian Army troops arrived at Srinagar airport immediately after the Accession was signed. On October 30, 1947 an Emergency Government was formed in the State with Sheikh Mohammad Abdullah as its head. The Army fought sustained battle with the tribals and after several sacrifices pushed them out of the Valley and other areas in the Jammu region.

Meanwhile, the people of Kashmir under the towering leadership of Sher-I-Kashmir were mobilised and they resisted the marching columns of the enemy. Till the arrival of the troops, it were mainly the Muslim volunteers under the command of Sheikh Mohammad Abdullah who braved death to push back invaders. Lt.General P.C.Sen who as Brigadier functioned as Commander of 161 Infantry Brigade in Srinagar during 1947-48, wrote in his book, ‘Slander was the Thread’, "These volunteers moved across the mountains and forests with speed and gave accurate information the army about enemy’s strength, location and movements". 

Tuesday, July 13, 2010

Thursday, June 17, 2010

How and why Muslim Conference was changed into National Conference? by Zahir-ud-Din

 How and why Muslim Conference was changed into National Conference? by Zahir-ud-Din


source: http://www.risingkashmir.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=24350

First blunder

How and why Muslim Conference was changed into National Conference?


Zahir-ud-Din

The process of rechristening Muslim Conference (MC) started in 1933. The annual session of the organisation was held at Mirpur (now in Pakistan-administered Kashmir) on September from 15 to 17 1933.

Several resolutions were passed on the concluding day of the session.  One of the resolutions sought participation of non-Muslims in the freedom struggle. The resolution was, by and large, welcomed by the members. However, some members described it a conspiracy against Muslim unity. The resolution also evoked reaction from Dr Sir Muhammad Iqbal. The great poet in his letter (dated October 12, 1933) urged Sheikh Muhammad Abdullah to ensure unity of Muslims without fail.

The conversion process was formally launched during the sixth annual session of the MC held on March 25-27, 1938 at Jammu.  In his presidential address, Sheikh Abdullah stressed the need for `responsible government.’ Several resolutions were passed. It was decided to change the name of the organisation to ensure participation of non-Muslims in the struggle.

A meeting was held at Srinagar. Muhammad Umar Bhat suggested creation of a new organisation `National Congress’. However, this was severely opposed. But Bhat created the National Congress and some people including Raghunath Vaishnavi, Seth Kishori Lal, Madan Lal, Ved Prakash and Ali Muhammad Bhat joined it.

On June 24, 1938 a special meeting of the working committee of MC was held at Srinagar. Most of the members severely opposed creation of National Conference (NC). Moulvi Abdullah Vakil accused Sheikh Abdullah of a sell-out.  Editor of Pasbaan, Syed Meraj-ud-Din Ahmad said: “The oath taken by Sheikh Abdullah, Dr Peshan, Ram Nath Shastri, Jia Lal Kilam and Kashap Bandhu to break the MC has been fulfilled.”

Well-known leader from Jammu Chowdhary Ghulam Abbas severely criticized the move. He said: “NC will become a mistress of Indian National Congress.” Sheikh Abdullah listened patiently but rejected the apprehensions of the members as unfounded. Finally Abbas consented to the conversion on the following conditions:

NC shall have no truck with the Congress; the inclusion of non-Muslims should not harm the identity of the Muslims; Hindus and Muslims cannot unite. However, they can work together to achieve political goals; we hope Sheikh Abdullah shall not take any step to harm the interests of Muslims.

Sheikh Abdullah readily agreed to these conditions. Soon, Sheikh Abdullah and other leaders were arrested in connection with ‘responsible government’ agitation. In February the leaders were released and by the end of May the stage was all set for the `infamous conversion’.

On June 11 NC was suggested as the new name of the organisation. Some members stood up to express their views but Sheikh Abdullah did not allow them to do so. Moulvi Abdullah Vakil offered resistance. He said: “I have a right to express my views. I do not accept your decision.”

Sheikh Abdullah told him to walk out of the room. Ghulam Ahmad Ganie, Sheikh Ahmad Din, Mirwaiz Ghulam Nabi Hamdani and seven others also walked out along with Vakil.

This is how Muslim Conference was taken to the altar for ensuring participation of non-Muslims in the freedom struggle. Surprisingly non-Muslims lived comfortably in Dogra rule. They were loyal to the Dogra rulers and missed no opportunity to subject Muslims to persecution. But, Sher-e-Kashmir saw a role for them in the freedom struggle. But contrary to his expectations, the newly formed National Conference (NC), however, evoked lukewarm response from the non-Muslims. Attempts to revive the Muslim Conference (MC) started immediately.

The idea was discussed in detail by senior NC workers including Ghulam Muhammad Bakshi. Munshi Naseer-ud-Din (Editor Albarq) discussed it with Sheikh as well. It is believed that Sheikh agreed in principle with the members. He is believed to have told Munshi Naseer: “You go ahead. I will work as an ordinary member of the MC. I will not accept its leadership.” One such meeting was held in the lawns of erstwhile Teachers’ Training School at Magarmal Bagh.

In 1944 when Quaid-e-Azam Muhammad Ali Jinnah visited Kashmir, the NC hosted a reception in his honour. Ghulam Mohi-ud-Din Zahra Hamdanai posed three questions to the Quaid. The Quaid answered the questions politely. Question No 1: Is creation of Pakistan possible in presence of overwhelming majority of Hindus of India?  The Quaid replied: “If De Veer can separate Ireland from Britain, why should not 10 crore Muslims succeed in creating a state of their own?”

Question No 2: “If Pakistan comes into existence, will it not be a poor country?” Quaid replied: “No. Not at all. It is better to live in a shabby hut than live in a mansion in insecure India.”

Question No 3: “Keeping the Muslim Majority population of the state in view which party can serve the interests of Muslims better. NC or MC?” The Quaid replied: “Apparently NC. But can you tell me how many non-Muslims are members of the party?”

This stunned the NC workers. Hamdani had to eat a humble pie. Someone from the crowd cried, “Budh Singh, Kashap Bandhu.” This was greeted with laughter by the people present much to the discomfort of the NC workers.

The Quaid said: “Had non-Muslims joined the NC, the Maharaja’s government would have succumbed in seven days.”

As the time passed the non-Muslims in the NC started giving sleepless nights to Sheikh Abdullah. He had to shave off his beard. Soon after his `trusted friend’ Kashap Bandhu wrote an editorial in Martand and criticized Sheikh Abdullah for taking out Millad processions. A frightened Sheikh succumbed. In 1943 Sheikh decided not to take out the procession. This gave the newly formed MC a chance to prove its mettle. A Millad procession sponsored by MC evoked overwhelming response.

Raghunath Vaishnavi who was the general secretary of National Congress, an organisation that later merged into NC also deserted him. In 1953 he joined the Political Conference, an organisation that stood for total merger of Jammu Kashmir into Pakistan.

Another friend, Prem Nath Bazaz also parted ways. He jointly owned the daily Hamdard with Sheikh Abdullah. The partnership was broken and Bazaz became his `worst enemy’.  On June 10, 1947, Bazaz wrote an editorial in Hamdard. It read: “The Hindus do not like NC. However, some Hindus have joined it not because they love it but for the hatred it has exhibited against Muslims of India. The inclusion of a handful of Hindus in NC does not make it a representative of the minorities. The Hindus and Sikhs praise NC in public because they believe that it is working against the interests of Muslims...”

In 1975 when Sheikh Abdullah signed the infamous Indira-Abdullah accord, his `friend’ Kashap Bandhu refused to join his government. The only non-Muslim who remained with was Budh Singh.

Saturday, June 12, 2010

Jammu and Kashmir has a vast Minerals and Mineral based industry

Jammu and Kashmir has a vast Minerals and Mineral based industry

Jammu and Kashmir has a vast mineral base. Limestone, gypsum, bauxite, marble, magnesite, dolomite, lignite, quartzite and coal are some the minerals found in the state. The state is also known to possess large deposits of Sapphire 

Mineral based industry

The state has vast deposits of minerals like coal, gypsum, bauxite, lignite, graphite, magnetic and limestone. Out of above major minerals deposits, coal is exploited the most. The other minerals, which follow coal in exploitation, include gypsum and lignite etc. Lignite being used as fuel in industries in the state is also exported to Punjab and nearby states.

Minerals Commercially Exploitable: Mineral

Coal Lignite
Limestone Gypsum
Cement clays Bauxite
Graphite Magnesite
Saphire  


A number of mineral based projects in the state have also been identified for private investment.

Deposits of commercially exploitable minerals

No. Mineral Deposits

1. Coal 33 million
2. Gypsum 1 million (Proven) (Indicated 9.5 million)
3. Bauxite        8 million
4. Graphite 16 million
5. Limestone   Around 200 million

Source: IndiaStat

Gems & jewellery

Given the rich tradition of handicrafts and the availability of required skills, processing of gems and jewellery is one of the key industries in the state

Geography of Jammu and Kashmir State by Dr. A. N. Raina - From Satisar and Tethya sea

Geography of Jammu and Kashmir State by Dr. A. N. Raina - From Satisar and Tethya sea

Geologists believe that about ten crore years have passed when Kashmir Valley which was once a lake called Satisar, the lake of goddess Sati, came into its present form.

For hundreds of million years Kashmir Valley remained under Tethya sea and the high sedimentary-rock hills seen in the valley now were once under water. Geologists have come to believe that Kashmir Valley was earlier affected by earthquakes. Once there was such a devastating earthquake that it broke open the mountain wall at Baramulla. and the water of the Satisar lake flowed out leaving behind lacustrine mud on the margins of the mountains known as karewas. Thus came into existence the oval but irregular Valley of Kashmir. 

The karewas being in fact the remnants of this lake confirm this view. The karewas are found mostly to the west of the river Jhelum where these table-lands attain a height of about 380 meters above the level of the Valley. These karewas protrude towards the east and look like tongue-shaped spurs with deep ravines.

Ancient legends and popular traditions say that Samdimat Nagar, capital of the kingdom of Sundra Sena, was submerged as a result of an earthquake, and the water that filled the area formed the Wular Lake, the largest fresh water lake in India. 

The oldest igneous rocks are still found at Shankaracharya hill. When the whole Valley of Kashmir was under water this hillock was the first piece of dry land lying in the form of an igneous island.

Excerpts from:
Geography of Jammu & Kashmir State
by Dr. A. N. Raina
Radha Krishan Anand & Co.
Pacca Danga, Jammu

Thursday, June 10, 2010

UN discussion about the Kashmir issue-- “WHOSE LAND IS IT ANY WAY?”

I want to share this story with you and the other readers. Perhaps you may have already heard about it. Once there was a meeting in UN to discuss about the Kashmir issue. 

The Indian representative started to say, “Before I present the papers regarding India’s stand on this issue, I want to tell every one present here about how Kashmir got its name. More than 5000 years ago, the entire Kashmir Valley was immersed in water and was known as Satisar Lake. A Hindu Brahmin called Rishi Kashyap converted the vast lake into a beautiful valley thru’ his hard meditation and austerities and asked all the Hindu Brahmins to come and live there. It was then known as Kashyapmir (in his name) which later became Kashmir. One day when he was taking his bath in the lake, leaving his clothes on the hills of Baramulla, a Muslim guy stole his clothes”

At this point, the representative from Pakistan got up angrily and interrupted the Indian guy shouting, “Why are you accusing the Muslims? Muslims weren’t even there at that time. Islam wasn’t even born then”. The Indian representative smiled and said, “This is precisely the point I want to make, he admitted it and everybody heard him. Now you decide about Kashmir, “WHOSE LAND IS IT ANY WAY?”

And this is the point the whole non-muslim world has to make and send all of them back to the place where they originally came from—-THE BARREN DESERTS OF ARABIA! 


If they were born in our lands, let them convert back to the faith of their ancestors, the original inhabitants of the land they occupy.

Jammu Kashmir & Laddakh

Popular Posts

Search This Blog